Cancer Survivors' and Care Partners' Audio Diaries on Stress and Social Support Resources During the COVID-19 Pandemic.

OBJECTIVES: To describe cancer survivors' and care partners' perceived stress and social support during the COVID-19 pandemic and assess the feasibility of audio diaries for assessing role-related needs and resources. METHODS: Participants (N = 51; n = 28 survivors, n = 23 care partners) recorded three monthly audio diaries reporting stress and support experiences. Diaries were transcribed and content-analyzed using a hybrid approach. Stress-related content was inductively coded, and social support content was deductively coded by type (instrumental, information, emotional, companionship, appraisal; κ = 0.75) then inductively coded. Descriptive statistics summarized sociodemographic data and compared coding frequencies by role. We developed narrative summaries of stress and support categories and selected quotes for contextual detail. RESULTS: Cancer-related stressors were most prevalent (28.8%), followed by work (26.8%), family (23.1%), social isolation (13.4%), and finances (8.0%). While no significant difference in reporting frequency was observed between roles, cancer-related stress was more prevalent for survivors while work-related stress was mentioned more by care partners. Emotional support was the most prevalent support type (32.1%), followed by companionship (25.3%), appraisal (17.9%), instrumental (16.67%), and informational support (8%). Survivors reported more appraisal support than care partners (χ2 = 6.48, df = 1, P = .011) and more support for self-care, while care partners expressed more other-oriented concerns and focused more on managing responsibilities and interactions outside the household. CONCLUSIONS: The pandemic complicated and intensified role-based stressors already present in the survivorship context. Our findings highlight the importance of informal social support networks, particularly when access to formal services is limited, and suggest that audio diaries can be an effective tool for assessing support needs and resources. IMPLICATIONS FOR NURSING PRACTICE: Nurses and healthcare providers should tailor social support assessments to address the distinct support needs and individual resources of cancer survivors and their care partners. This is especially critical in contexts that limit access to care and formal services.

LGBTQ+ inequity in crowdfunding cancer costs: The influence of online reach and LGBTQ+ state policy.

BACKGROUND: Emerging literature suggests that LGBTQ+ cancer survivors are more likely to experience financial burden than non-LGBTQ+ survivors. However, LGBTQ+ cancer survivors experience with cost-coping behaviors such as crowdfunding is understudied. METHODS: We aimed to assess LGBTQ+ inequity in cancer crowdfunding by combining community-engaged and technology-based methods. Crowdfunding campaigns were web-scraped from GoFundMe and classified as cancer-related and LGBTQ+ or non-LGBTQ+ using term dictionaries. Bivariate analyses and generalized linear models were used to assess differential effects in total goal amount raised by LGBTQ+ status. Stratified models were run by online reach and LGBTQ+ inclusivity of state policy. RESULTS: A total of N = 188,342 active cancer-related crowdfunding campaigns were web-scraped from GoFundMe in November 2022, of which N = 535 were LGBTQ+ and ranged from 2014 to 2022. In multivariable models of recent campaigns (2019-2022), LGBTQ+ campaigns raised $1608 (95% CI: -2139, -1077) less than non-LGBTQ+ campaigns. LGBTQ+ campaigns with low (26-45 donors), moderate (46-87 donors), and high (88-240 donors) online reach raised on average $1152 (95% CI: -$1589, -$716), $1050 (95% CI: -$1737, -$364), and $2655 (95% CI: -$4312, -$998) less than non-LGBTQ+ campaigns respectively. When stratified by LGBTQ+ inclusivity of state level policy states with anti-LGBTQ+ policy/lacking equitable policy raised on average $1910 (95% CI: -2640, -1182) less than non-LGBTQ+ campaigns from the same states. CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE: Our findings revealed LGBTQ+ inequity in cancer-related crowdfunding, suggesting that LGBTQ+ cancer survivors may be less able to address financial burden via crowdfunding in comparison to non-LGBTQ+ cancer survivors-potentially widening existing economic inequities.

The Burden of having to Wonder: Hospice Caregiving Experiences of LGBTQ+ Cancer Family Caregivers.

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: LGBTQ+ people are more likely to be caregivers for family and friends with life-limiting illnesses than non-LGBTQ+ people. LGBTQ+ caregivers may also experience stigma, bias, and discrimination, in addition to caregiving stress. Yet few studies have elicited LGBTQ+ family caregivers' perspectives on their end-of-life (EOL) experiences of home hospice. RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS: We conducted semi-structured interviews with LGBTQ+ family caregivers of home hospice patients (N = 20). Following an interpretive descriptive approach, interview data were audio recorded, transcribed, and iteratively coded, and themes were developed and synthesized. RESULTS: The burden of having to wonder expressed caregivers' uncertainty and concern about whether their negative experiences were common to all EOL caregivers or stemmed from cultural stigma and provider bias. Participants described how invisibility vs. risks of disclosure, anticipatory anxiety, perceived microaggressions, and protective vigilance increased stress and complicated caregiver-provider communication. Navigating EOL universalities vs. minority realities depicted underlying tensions between commonly assumed universalities of EOL caregiving and LGBTQ+-specific experiences. Providers' discomfort, awkward communication, lack of access to culturally competent EOL support resources, and broader structural and cultural discrimination eroded their sense of connectedness and safety. Together, these themes characterized the impact of minority stress at EOL. DISCUSSION AND IMPLICATIONS: Our findings suggest that LGBTQ+ hospice caregivers are at risk for minority stress in addition to more common sources of EOL caregiving pressures and thus have specific support and communication needs. Providers must understand this to deliver effective EOL care for all families.

Exploring Online Crowdfunding for Cancer-Related Costs Among LGBTQ+ (Lesbian, Gay, Bisexual, Transgender, Queer, Plus) Cancer Survivors: Integration of Community-Engaged and Technology-Based Methodologies.

BACKGROUND: Cancer survivors frequently experience cancer-related financial burdens. The extent to which Lesbian, Gay, Bisexual, Transgender, Queer, Plus (LGBTQ+) populations experience cancer-related cost-coping behaviors such as crowdfunding is largely unknown, owing to a lack of sexual orientation and gender identity data collection and social stigma. Web-scraping has previously been used to evaluate inequities in online crowdfunding, but these methods alone do not adequately engage populations facing inequities. OBJECTIVE: We describe the methodological process of integrating technology-based and community-engaged methods to explore the financial burden of cancer among LGBTQ+ individuals via online crowdfunding. METHODS: To center the LGBTQ+ community, we followed community engagement guidelines by forming a study advisory board (SAB) of LGBTQ+ cancer survivors, caregivers, and professionals who were involved in every step of the research. SAB member engagement was tracked through quarterly SAB meeting attendance and an engagement survey. We then used web-scraping methods to extract a data set of online crowdfunding campaigns. The study team followed an integrated technology-based and community-engaged process to develop and refine term dictionaries for analyses. Term dictionaries were developed and refined in order to identify crowdfunding campaigns that were cancer- and LGBTQ+-related. RESULTS: Advisory board engagement was high according to metrics of meeting attendance, meeting participation, and anonymous board feedback. In collaboration with the SAB, the term dictionaries were iteratively edited and refined. The LGBTQ+ term dictionary was developed by the study team, while the cancer term dictionary was refined from an existing dictionary. The advisory board and analytic team members manually coded against the term dictionary and performed quality checks until high confidence in correct classification was achieved using pairwise agreement. Through each phase of manual coding and quality checks, the advisory board identified more misclassified campaigns than the analytic team alone. When refining the LGBTQ+ term dictionary, the analytic team identified 11.8% misclassification while the SAB identified 20.7% misclassification. Once each term dictionary was finalized, the LGBTQ+ term dictionary resulted in a 95% pairwise agreement, while the cancer term dictionary resulted in an 89.2% pairwise agreement. CONCLUSIONS: The classification tools developed by integrating community-engaged and technology-based methods were more accurate because of the equity-based approach of centering LGBTQ+ voices and their lived experiences. This exemplar suggests integrating community-engaged and technology-based methods to study inequities is highly feasible and has applications beyond LGBTQ+ financial burden research.

Hospice Family Caregivers' Uncertainty, Burden, and Unmet Needs in Prospective Audio Diaries.

Hospice cancer caregivers' (HCCs') burden and unmet needs are well documented in the literature through retrospective, standardized self-report surveys. Hospice cancer caregiver daily experiences of burden and unmet needs are rarely captured within a real-time context. The purpose of this secondary data analysis was to characterize HCCs' day-to-day burden and unmet needs with prospective HCC (N = 50) audio diary data between hospice enrollment and patient death. Uncertainty theory provided a framework for analysis. Diaries were transcribed, analyzed deductively and inductively, and organized thematically. Uncertainty in day-to-day experiences was an important driver of HCC burden and unmet needs. Unmet needs included unclear/unmet expectations regarding hospice care team support; not understanding the extent of HCC role and involvement; and communication challenges with hospice team members. Sources of HCCs' burden were dissonance between how they "should" feel and how they actually felt; feeling alone/having no outlet to express feelings; concerns about their own health and subsequent patient impact; and feeling helpless/occupying a liminal space. Uncertainty surrounding HCCs' experiences encompassed interactions with hospice care teams and the nature of end-of-life caregiving with symptom management, the dying process, and the HCC role. Hospice care teams can respond to uncertainty through assessment, understanding, and recognition of the daily context of HCCs.

Online Experiences, Internet-Fostered Connection, Resilience, and Adjustment Among Adolescent Siblings of Children With Cancer.

BACKGROUND: Pediatric cancer disrupts the lives of siblings in many ways, including physical separations from family and friends that increase risk for distress. Research suggests that siblings use technology and social media to connect with friends and family and seek social support and interaction. However, this may expose siblings to negative online experiences that can erode self-esteem, reducing resilience. OBJECTIVE: This study explored the relationship between online experiences, internet-fostered connection, resilience, and psychosocial health among siblings of children with cancer. METHODS: Participants included adolescent siblings (N = 81; aged 12-17 years) of children with cancer. Most were female (56.8%), and 50.6% represented racially or ethnically minoritized groups. Online experiences, social media use, resilience, and psychosocial health were self-reported and analyzed using structural equation modeling. RESULTS: A majority of siblings reported moderate to severe posttraumatic stress symptoms (PTSSs) (59%) and elevated emotional and behavioral difficulties (EBDs) (53%). Experiencing more positive online experiences was associated with greater perceived connection to family and friends online, but not resilience, PTSSs, or EBDs. In contrast, higher negative online experience scores were significantly associated with more PTSSs and EBDs. In addition, the association between negative online experiences and EBDs was significantly mediated by a negative association between negative online experiences and resilience. CONCLUSIONS: Although social media may be a valuable tool for helping siblings of children with cancer garner social support, negative online experiences may be detrimental to their adjustment. IMPLICATIONS FOR PRACTICE: Efforts should be made to preserve and foster resilience among siblings who use social media for support.

Caregiver Burden and Workplace Productivity Among Hospice Cancer Caregivers.

OBJECTIVES: To examine the relationships among family caregiver burden and workplace productivity and activity impairment among home hospice family caregivers of individuals with cancer who worked while providing end-of-life caregiving. SAMPLE & SETTING: Baseline data from a longitudinal study of communication between hospice providers and hospice family caregivers were used for this secondary analysis. METHODS & VARIABLES: Working family caregivers with complete workplace productivity and activity impairment data were included in this analysis (N = 30). Demographic data, caregiver burden, and workplace productivity and activity impairment were examined with descriptive statistics, correlation analysis, and hierarchical linear regressions. RESULTS: Hospice family caregivers were primarily White, female, married, and employed full-time. Caregiver burden levels were significantly positively associated with activity impairment, presenteeism, and work productivity loss. These relationships remained statistically significant when controlling for age. IMPLICATIONS FOR NURSING: Hospice and oncology nurses can support working hospice family caregivers by assessing for burden and associated workplace challenges, as well as by providing referrals for respite and community resources.

Cancer Hospice Caregivers' Self-care Behaviors: The Role of Caregiving Tasks, Burden, and Mental Health.

Cancer hospice family caregivers provide intensive support for patients at the end of life, sometimes at the expense of self-care. This secondary analysis examined the role of caregiving burden, activities of daily living, and mental health on self-care behaviors among cancer hospice family caregivers. Logistic regression models were adjusted for sociodemographic and caregiver characteristics, and model fit was evaluated with Hosmer-Lemeshow tests. Participants (N = 86) were mostly women (n = 62, 72.09%), White (n = 76, 88.37%), and spousal caregivers (n = 44, 51.16%). Almost half reported not getting enough rest (47.67%), time to exercise (47.67%), or time to slow down and rest when feeling ill (46.51%). Caregivers with better mental health reported being more likely to have enough time to exercise (adjusted odds ratio [OR adj ], 1.15, [1.05, 1.26]; P = .004), rest (OR adj , 1.11, [1.01, 1.22]; P = .031), and slow down when ill (OR adj , 1.16, [1.04, 1.30]; P = .010). Controlling for sociodemographic and caregiver characteristics, men caregivers had 88% lower odds of being able to rest when ill (OR adj , 0.12, [0.03, 0.52]; P = .005) compared with women. Number of care tasks, not caregiving burden, was associated with self-care behaviors. Findings provide a preliminary understanding of factors related to caregiver self-care and have implications for increased assessment of caregiver mental health and self-care needs to better support family-oriented hospice care.

Hospice Caregivers' Perception of Family and Non-Family Social Support and Stress over Time: Associations with Reports of General Support.

Social support has been identified as a key factor to protect wellbeing for home hospice cancer caregivers. However, few studies have assessed social support over time in this context, and measures of support are often limited to general assessments of perceived support. Our goal was to (1) describe change in cancer home hospice caregivers' social support over time during care and into bereavement and (2) explore the impact of perceived stress and support from family and non-family members on caregivers' perceived general social support. We conducted a secondary analysis of longitudinal prospective questionnaire data. Forty caregivers completed measures of general perceived support, family and non-family support and stress during hospice enrollment and 2 and 6 months post the patient's death. Linear mixed models were used to determine change in support over time and the contribution of specific support/stress ratings to general support assessments. Caregivers overall had moderate and stable levels of social support over time, though there was significant variation between and within individuals. Family and non-family support and stress from family predicted general perceptions of social support, while no effects were found for non-family stress. This work suggests a need for more specific measures of support and stress, and the need for research to focus on improving baseline levels of caregiver perceived support.

Moderating Effect of Work on Burden and Hospice Family Caregiver Well-Being.

Background: Hospice family caregiving is often physically and emotionally taxing, but it is unclear how employment status impacts hospice caregiver burden and well-being. Objective(s): To examine the relationship between caregiver burden and well-being, and the moderating role of employment status (i.e., working, not working). Design, Setting/Subjects: This was a secondary data analysis of baseline data from a longitudinal observational study of family caregivers of home hospice cancer patients in the United States. Descriptive statistics, correlations, hierarchical linear regressions, and moderation analyses were used. Measurements: Baseline data included demographics, preparedness for caregiving, perceived burden, and well-being (i.e., global health, positive affect and well-being, anxiety, depression). Results: The majority of the 90 participants were White (86.7%), married (71.1%), and college educated (85.6%). The mean age was 58.27 ± 14.22, 53.3% cared for a spouse, and 56.6% worked full or part time. After controlling for demographics, and using employment status as a moderator, greater caregiver burden was significantly associated with lower global health (ß = -0.82 [-1.22 to -0.42], p < 0.001), positive affect and well-being scores (ß = -0.69 [-1.03 to -0.36], p < 0.001), and higher depression (ß = 0.24 [0.12-0.37], p < 0.001) and anxiety scores (ß = 0.22 [0.07-0.37], p < 0.005). Employment status significantly moderated the relationship between burden and global health (ß = 0.65 [0.22 to 1.08], p < 0.005), and burden and positive affect and well-being (ß = 0.45 [0.06 to 0.84], p < 0.05). At high levels of burden, workers had greater well-being than nonworkers. Conclusion(s): More burdened hospice caregivers may experience worse well-being, especially among nonworking caregivers. Employment may be a protective factor for highly burdened hospice family caregivers.

Technology-Mediated Support Among Siblings of Children with Cancer.

Purpose: A diagnosis of pediatric cancer can leave healthy siblings with limited access to support. Technology-mediated interpersonal interactions have been noted among adolescent and young adults with cancer and may be an effective source of support for adolescent siblings of children with cancer. In this study, we understand how adolescent siblings use technology to connect with their support network and how their technology use changes after their sibling's cancer diagnosis. Methods: Participants included a national sample (N = 24) of adolescents aged 12-17 who had a sibling diagnosed with cancer in the last 2 years (up to 3 years if still receiving curative-focused treatment). Ecomaps were cocreated with participants to identify sources of social support and modality of interactions. Interviews were transcribed, coded, content analyzed, and descriptively summarized. Results: Adolescent siblings (mean = 14.2 years) perceived technology as a tool to maintain support from their established personal network, rather than a way to expand sources of social support. Most did not seek support or information about cancer outside their known network, preferring information to come from parents or trusted network members. Siblings identified video calls as an important resource for connecting with parents, their sick brother or sister, and others to receive emotional support and companionship. Conclusions: Findings suggest that adolescent siblings of children use technology to connect with their established network for support, an important finding for designing assessments and interventions for this population. Future inquiry should explore these differences, identify unmet needs, and inform acceptable, effective interventions to augment support.

Preparing for the Future While Living in the Present: Older Adults' Experiences Creating a Legacy of Values.

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: A legacy of values (e.g., legacy letter) is a nonlegal way to intentionally communicate intangible assets (e.g., values, life lessons, and emotional and supportive instruction) with others. There is scant research on legacy creation outside of a palliative care context, and no studies have explored the experiences of community-dwelling older adults creating a legacy of values. RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS: As part of an exploratory sequential mixed methods study, we conducted semistructured interviews with older adults (N = 16) who had previously created a legacy of values. We analyzed transcribed interviews using an interpretive descriptive approach. We iteratively coded interviews deductively with sensitizing concepts identified in the literature (existential well-being, end-of-life preparation and completion, generativity, and resilience), and inductively, based on participants' descriptions. Codes were categorized by patterns of motivations, content, outcomes, and meaning, and thematically summarized. RESULTS: We conceptualized the overall experience of creating a legacy of values as Preparing for the Future While Living in the Present and identified 4 themes: Preserving the Intangible for You and for Me, Sharing What I Want You to Know, Obtaining Peace through Reflection and Preparation, and Living into a Continuing Legacy. Participants attained peace, realized their life was not complete, and were challenged to live intentionally through legacy creation. DISCUSSION AND IMPLICATIONS: Creating a legacy of values may concurrently prepare older adults for the end of life and the remainder of life. These findings offer insight into a generative act that can promote intentional living among older adults.

Family Caregiver Reports of Their Own and Patient Symptoms in Cancer Home Hospice Approaching End-of-Life.

Context: Family caregivers assume the primary responsibility of assessing and managing hospice cancer patient symptoms while simultaneously managing their own wellbeing and symptoms. Objectives: Describe caregivers' assessment of hospice cancer patient and their own symptoms during the last 60 days of patient life, and assess the relationship between patient and caregiver symptoms over time. Methods: Caregiver symptom report of self and cancer home hospice patient symptom data were collected via telephone in the final 60 days of patient life. Descriptive data on symptom severity and prevalence were summarized. Exploratory Factor Analysis was used to group individual symptoms. Factors representing patient symptoms, caregiver symptoms, and caregiver outlook were analyzed using mixed-effects analysis to determine relationships between factors and change in relationship between factors over time. Results: Data from 61 patient-caregiver dyads are presented. At least 1 day of moderate-to-severe symptoms were reported in the majority of dyads. Significant auto-regressive associations were found, namely previous factor scores for an individual positively predicted the next factor scores for that individual. Previous caregiver report of patient symptoms was also positively associated with the next report of caregiver symptoms; previous caregiver report of their own symptoms were negatively associated with their next report of patient symptoms. Patient and caregiver symptoms and caregiver outlook worsened over time and the relationship between patient and caregiver symptoms strengthened closer to death. Conclusion: Our findings may guide hospice care team responses to caregiver and patient symptoms to promote individual level and unit level functioning.

Home Hospice Family Caregivers' Use of Audio Diaries and Reported Prevalence of Patient and Caregiver Symptoms.

CONTEXT: Family caregivers are essential to home hospice care for patients with advanced cancer, including reporting patient symptoms to hospice providers for follow-up. Hospice caregiving can also impact personal well-being. OBJECTIVES: 1) Assess home hospice caregivers' use of prospective, longitudinal audio diaries tracking patient and caregiver wellbeing; 2) Explore how patient-focused vs. caregiver-focused diary prompts perform; 3) Examine the prevalence of interactive voice response (IVR)-tracked symptoms and whether diaries revealed additional symptoms. METHODS: Caregivers (N=102) were asked to report patient and caregiver symptoms via daily IVR calls and could record optional diaries responding to patient-focused or caregiver-focused prompts. Diaries were transcribed, classified by presence/absence of new information, and compared by prompt type. Content coding for IVR-tracked symptoms and inductive coding for additional symptoms were summarized by frequency counts and exemplary quotes. RESULTS: Sixty-nine percent of participants (n=70) recorded diaries, and of these 72.86% (n=51) recorded ≥ one new-information diary. The median recording length was 53.00 seconds (SD=53.36). Participants responding to the caregiver-focused prompt (n=33) recorded more diaries than those in the patient-focused group (n=37; U=437.500, P=0.04. Most prevalent IVR-tracked symptoms were patient fatigue/weakness (26.54% of symptoms mentioned) and pain (23.08%), and caregiver anxiety/nervousness (47.51%) and fatigue (22.10%). The most prevalent additional symptoms were patient increasing sleepiness/sleeping (26.32%) and breathing difficulties (24.32%), and negative caregiver emotions (e.g., guilt, resentment, anger; 29.17%). CONCLUSION: Prospective audio diaries offer a viable avenue for communicating symptoms and support needs. Future research will focus on leveraging longitudinal data for developing focused and tailored caregiver support interventions.

Posttraumatic growth and life course stress predict dyadic wellbeing among sexual and gender minority (SGM) and non-SGM couples facing cancer.

OBJECTIVE: This study examined: (1) Differences among sexual and gender minority (SGM) and non-SGM couples' life course stress, posttraumatic growth (PTG), individual, and dyadic wellbeing while facing cancer, (2) The predictive ability of PTG and life course stress on wellbeing for each dyad member, and (3) The predictive ability of dyad-level PTG and dyad-level life course stress on dyadic wellbeing. METHODS: Thirty SGM and 30 non-SGM dyads (N = 60) completed measures assessing demographics, life course stress, PTG, individual, and dyadic wellbeing. Regression and multilevel models tested predictive hypotheses. RESULTS: Participants were 56.3 years old on average (SD = 13.6) and were together for 24.2 (SD = 14.9) years. SGM participants reported greater life course stress and higher scores on the Depression, Anxiety, and Stress Scales (DASS-21) than non-SGM participants. A dyad members' higher PTG predicted their partners' higher DASS-21 score, dyad members' higher life course stress predicted their own higher DASS-21 score, and patients' higher life course stress predicted their partners' higher DASS-21 score. Greater dyadic PTG predicted greater dyadic wellbeing. CONCLUSIONS: SGM and non-SGM couples experience PTG equally despite SGM couples' greater life course stress and higher DASS-21 scores. Future research is needed to explore how PTG may affect individuals and couples differently.

Exploring Social Support Networks and Interactions of Young Adult and LGBTQIA+ Cancer Survivors and Care Partners.

Purpose: The purpose of this study was to describe the social support networks and daily support interactions of cancer-affected individuals, including young adult (YA) and LGBTQIA+ survivors and care partners. Methods: Participants were recruited at two United States cancer centers and via social media for a pilot study testing a novel online method for collecting prospective, daily social support interaction data (N=28). All participants were aged 18+; survivors had a current or recent cancer diagnosis and were engaged in treatment and/or services; care partners were identified by the survivors. Enrollment also purposefully targeted YA and LGBTQIA+ survivors. Social network data (up to 10 members) were assessed at baseline. Daily online surveys assessed support interactions between participants and specific network members over 14 days. Descriptive statistics summarized data and explored between-group (YA/non-YA, LGBTQIA+/non-LGBTQIA+) differences in social network characteristics (size, heterogeneity, density, centralization, cohesion) and support interactions (support source and type). Results: There were no significant differences between YA and non-YA participants on any measures. LGBTQIA+ participants' support networks were less dense (Mdn=0.69 vs. 0.82, p=.02), less cohesive (Mdn=0.85 vs. 0.91,.02), more centered on the participant (Mdn=0.40 vs. 0.24, p=.047), and included more LGBTQIA+ members (Mdn=0.35 vs. 0.00, p<.001). LGBTQIA+ participants reported having more interactions with LGBTQIA+ network members (Mdn=14.0 vs. Mdn=0.00, p<.001) and received significantly more of all types of support from LGBTQIA+ vs. non-LGBTQIA+ members. LGBTQIA+ participants also reported receiving more appraisal support than non-LGBTQIA+ (Mdn 21.64 vs. 9.12, p=.008) including more appraisal support from relatives (Mdn=11.73 vs 6.0, p+.037). Conclusions: Important information related to support access, engagement, and needs is embedded within the everyday contexts of the social networks of cancer-affected people. Individualized, accessible, and prospective assessment could help illuminate how their "real world" support systems are working and identify specific strengths and unmet needs. These insights would inform the development of more culturally competent and tailored interventions to help people understand and leverage their unique support systems. This is particularly critical for groups like YA and LGBTQIA+ survivors and care partners that are underserved by formal support services and underrepresented in cancer, caregiving, and social support research.

"It's Kind of Complicated": A Qualitative Exploration of Perceived Social Support in Young Adult and Young Adult Lesbian, Gay, Bisexual, Transgender, and/or Queer Cancer Survivors.

Purpose: This qualitative secondary analysis describes the perceived importance of familial, peer, and health system social support for an understudied group of cancer survivors: young adults (YAs), including those who are lesbian, gay, bisexual, transgender, and/or queer (LGBTQ). Methods: Semistructured interviews were conducted with YA cancer survivors as part of a study of social support networks and interactions. Team members conducted content analysis of interview transcripts; coding decisions were reviewed and discussed among the research team. Descriptions of social support were ultimately organized around family, peer, and health care system support. Results: Twelve YA survivors recruited using two National Cancer Institute (NCI)-designated Comprehensive Cancer Centers and social media participated between August 2019 and May 2020. Survivors averaged 28.2 years old. Half of survivors self-identified as female; four survivors were LGBTQ. Participants described both the positives of social support, as well as barriers to meeting support needs, within the following three levels: familial, peer, and health care providers or system. Conclusion: YA survivors have needs that are often addressed by their families, peers, and the health care system. However, barriers such as complex relationship history and lack of targeted/tailored support programs can prevent survivors from receiving adequate support. The growing diversity and intersectionality represented in the YA population call for targeted support and training by the health care system to sufficiently support this population.

Feasibility, usability, and acceptability of personalized web-based assessment of social network and daily social support interactions over time.

PURPOSE: The purpose of this study was to test the feasibility, usability, and acceptability of implementing a web-based method for collecting social network and longitudinal daily interaction data from cancer survivors and their caregivers. METHODS: Young adult and sexual/gender minority cancer survivors and their informal caregivers were recruited as dyads. Feasibility data, including enrollment and retention, were captured. Individual social network data were collected at baseline and used to individualize daily electronically delivered surveys assessing characteristics of daily social support-related interactions with identified network members for 14 days. Follow-up questionnaires assessing usability and exit interviews assessing acceptability were completed at the end of the 2-week study period. RESULTS: Fourteen survivor-caregiver dyads (28 individual participants) were enrolled and completed all baseline and final measures. Participants completed 85.2% of daily diary reports and reported excellent usability ratings. Acceptability was also high. In qualitative interviews, participants reported enjoying the daily reflection on social support facilitated by our methods. CONCLUSIONS: Our method has been shown to be highly feasible, usable, and acceptable. IMPLICATIONS FOR CANCER SURVIVORS: Developing better data collection tools can lead to better understanding of the social support cancer survivors and their caregivers receive, and how the social network structure facilitates or creates barriers to accessing this support.

The Social Networks and Social Support of Siblings of Children with Cancer.

Siblings of children with cancer need support to ameliorate the challenges they encounter; however, little is known about what types and sources of support exist for siblings. This study addresses this gap in our understanding of the social networks and sources of support for adolescents with a brother or sister who has cancer. Additionally, we describe how the support siblings receive addresses what they feel are the hardest aspects of being a sibling of a child with cancer. During semi-structured interviews, siblings (ages 12-17) constructed ecomaps describing their support networks. Data were coded for support type (emotional, instrumental, informational, validation, companionship) and support provider (e.g., mother, teacher, friend). Network characteristics and patterns of support were explored. Support network size ranged from 3 to 10 individuals (M = 6 ± 1.9); siblings most frequently reported mothers as sources of support (n = 22, 91.7%), followed by fathers (n = 19, 79.2%), close friends (n = 19, 79.2%) and siblings (with or without cancer) (n = 17, 70.8%). Friends and brothers or sisters most often provided validation and companionship while instrumental and informational supports came from parents. This study provides foundational knowledge about siblings' support networks, which can be utilized to design interventions that improve support for siblings of children with cancer.

Social support enactments on social media during the first 6 months of young adult cancer caregiving.

PURPOSE: To explore how family/friend young adult cancer caregivers (YACC) used social media for social support in a cross-sectional retrospective mixed-methods study. METHODS: Eligible YACC were recruited online and in-person from September 2017 to June 2018, were 18-39 years, used social media weekly, and cared for an adult cancer patient diagnosed 6 months-5 years prior (N = 34). Social media posts were randomly sampled, and content analyzed for five types of social support (emotional, informational, validation, companionship, instrumental). Generalized linear models were fit to estimate changes in the prevalence of social support in posts over the 6-month period following diagnosis. RESULTS: The investigators analyzed N = 2090 social media posts, 26.9% made by YACC, and 73.1% by followers; 36.8% were cancer-related. The most common type of social support for YACC on social media was emotional (63.3%), followed by informational (27.7%), validation (15.3%), companionship (5.7%), and instrumental (1.3%). When controlling for platform (e.g., Instagram), the odds of posts containing emotional support decreased significantly over the first 6 months of caregiving (adjusted odds ratio [aOR]: 0.90, 95%CI 0.85-0.94), while informational (aOR: 1.15, 95%CI 1.09-1.21) and companionship (aOR: 1.12, 95%CI 1.02-1.24) support increased. CONCLUSIONS: YACC and their followers share emotional and informational support on social media. Next steps should determine how social media may improve (e.g., social support) or hinder (e.g., misinformation) cancer caregiving throughout survivorship. IMPLICATIONS FOR CANCER SURVIVORS: Caregivers and patients should be aware of possible fluctuations in social media support after diagnosis and the utility of using social media for different types of social support.